Skip to main content
· 12/15/1966

Cook v. Toney

Citations

  • 224 A.2d 857
  • 245 Md. 42
  • 1966 Md. LEXIS 398

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when the new trial was granted, the verdict and judgment were eliminated entirely and the case was put back in the same condition as if no trial had ever been held
  • holding that when the new trial was granted, the verdict and judgment were eliminated entirely and the ease was put back in the same condition as if no trial had ever been held
  • “if the motion of [the defendant] Toney for a new trial had been overruled or if the granting of a new trial had ... been reversed by this Court on appeal, the plaintiff would have been entitled to [post-judgment] interest from the date of the original [judgment] against Toney”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hammond, Horney, Marbury, Barnes, McWilliams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.