Cook v. State (Slip Opinion)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that particular allegations concerning one patient were sufficient because they arose from a “systematic failure” that necessarily “infected” other claims with fraud
• recognizing that “billing parties are often subject to thousands of complex statutory and regulatory provisions”
• concluding that, under Ninth Circuit precedent, relators must satisfy Escobar’s two elements to prevail on an implied false certification theory
• holding that, “at least in certain circumstances, the implied false certification theory can be a basis for liability”
• holding that “the implied certification theory can be a basis for liability” under the False Claims Act where the failure to disclose noncompliance with “material” requirements makes representations “misleading half-truths”
• holding that a claim that fails to disclose the de- fendant’s violation of a material statutory, regulatory, or contractual requirement is a misrepresentation rendering the claim false or fraud- ulent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).