· 7/27/2004
Cook v. Newman
Citations
- 142 S.W.3d 880
- 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1093
- 2004 WL 1660454
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- courts reject interpretations that render statutory language “mere surplusage” because “[presumably, the legislature does not insert superfluous language in. a stat> ute”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ellis, Lowenstein, Ulrich, Spinden, Smart, Smith, Howard, Newton, Holliger, Hardwick, Turnage
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.