Cook v. NC Two, L.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that notice in a garnishment proceeding is “of constitutional dimension” and declining to extend the rule of substantial compliance to the notice requirements plainly set forth in the statute
• holding that trial court erred in denying judgment debtor’s traverse, in which he argued that plaintiff must strictly comply with OCGA § 18-4-64 (a) when providing judgment debtor with notice of garnishment action
• holding that trial court erred in denying judgment debtor's traverse, in which he argued that plaintiff must strictly comply with OCGA § 18-4-64 (a) when providing judgment debtor with notice of garnishment action
• “[Wjhere a statute is ‘plain and susceptible of but one natural and reasonable construction,... the legislature’s clear intent... will not be thwarted by invocation of the rule of “substantial compliance.” ’ ” (citation omitted)
• “rules of statutory construction are not applicable when the statute is plain and unambiguous and susceptible to but one natural and reasonable construction since judicial construction of such a statute is unauthorized”
• “rules of statutory construction are not applicable when the statute is plain and unambiguous and susceptible to but one natural and reasonable construction since judicial construction of such a statute is unauthorized”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).