Skip to main content
· 9/7/1961

Cook v. Mason ex rel. Mason

Citations

  • 133 So. 2d 428

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an intent to maintain conscious dominion may be inferred from the totality of the circumstances, and circumstantial evidence may be used to establish a defendant’s possession of drugs or contraband
  • concluding that police officers, executing a valid search warrant, properly seized items that were not listed in the search warrant, but matched the description of items stolen in the robberies under investigation
  • recognizing as a substantial question a claim that a sentencing court failed to consider defendant’s rehabilitative needs in imposing a manifestly excessive sentence
  • holding, where Commonwealth conceded the defendant raised a substantial question, that trial court did not abuse its discretion in imposing a de facto life sentence comprised of multiple consecutive sentences
  • observing that a bald or generic assertion that a sentence is excessive does not, by itself, raise a substantial question justifying this Court’s review of the merits of the underlying claim
  • observing that a bald or generic assertion that a sentence is excessive does not, by itself, raise a substantial question justifying this Court’s review of the merits of the underlying claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carroll, Donald, Sturgis, Wigginton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.