Cook v. Cook

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[M]ere agreement by the parties does not vitiate the court’s duty to scrutinize the settlement agreement, and if the agreement is not valid, just and equitable, the court should reject or alter it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re the Marriage of Traster
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2014-12-19· cited 67×
• Cook v. Cook
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1982-06-11· cited 15×
• In Re the Marriage of Kirk
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1997-06-20· cited 12×
• Oehme v. Oehme
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1984-12-14· cited 11×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Motor Equipment Co. v. McLaughlin
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1943-01-23· cited 51×
• Sweeney v. Merchants National Bank
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1972-07-19· cited 43×
• Libel v. Libel
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1980-09-12· cited 12×
• Neis v. Neis
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1979-08-31· cited 10×
• Lewis v. Lewis
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1979-12-07· cited 9×
• Wiles v. Wiles
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1968-03-09· cited 6×
• Scimeca v. Scimeca
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1977-03-04· cited 5×