Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1/3/1984
Cook v. Cook
Citations
- 311 S.E.2d 90
- 280 S.C. 91
- 1984 S.C. App. LEXIS 331
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding a child custody matter for a trial de novo after a four-year lapse between court proceedings resulted in a stale record
- where this Court remanded a child custody case for a trial de novo because, among other reasons, “the record had become stale.” Georgetown County Dept. of Social Services v. Phipps, 278 S.C. 64, 292 S.E. (2d) 184 (1982
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sanders, Gardner, Bell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Tillman v. OakesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-05-30· cited 12×
- Dorn v. CriddleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-10-14· cited 4×
- O'Neill v. CooperCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-06-22· cited 2×
- Nathenia J. Rossington v. Julio A. RossingtonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2022-11-23
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Davenport v. DavenportSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1975-12-01· cited 64×
- Powell v. PowellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1971-05-03· cited 17×
- Garvin v. GarvinSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-10-15· cited 8×
- Georgetown County Department of Social Services v. PhippsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-05-26· cited 8×
- Cudd v. ArlineSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-11-12· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.