Skip to main content
· 5/12/2009

Cook v. Astrue

Citations

  • 629 F. Supp. 2d 925
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40445
  • 2009 WL 1383249

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the argument that the remand was required where the ALJ described the plaintiff's RFC in terms of \light work\ without a function- by-function analysis
  • “[W]hile it may be better practice to make specific objective physical characteristic findings in the ALJ’s determination of RFC, a failure to do so is not reversible error when the ALJ has sufficiently developed the record as to the claimant’s RFC.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: William A. Knox

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.