· 5/12/2009
Cook v. Astrue
Citations
- 629 F. Supp. 2d 925
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40445
- 2009 WL 1383249
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting the argument that the remand was required where the ALJ described the plaintiff's RFC in terms of \light work\ without a function- by-function analysis
- “[W]hile it may be better practice to make specific objective physical characteristic findings in the ALJ’s determination of RFC, a failure to do so is not reversible error when the ALJ has sufficiently developed the record as to the claimant’s RFC.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: William A. Knox
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.