· 8/10/1990
Cook, Perkiss And Liehe, Inc. v. Northern California Collection Service Inc.
Citations
- 911 F.2d 242
- 15 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1894
- 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 13667
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that statement “we’re the low cost commercial collection experts” was puffery because any implication that services were superior to that of the competition was “merely general in nature”
- noting that “misdescriptions of specific or absolute characteristics of a product 27 are actionable”
- upholding the dismissal of a claim without leave to amend where the defect in the pleading could not be cured
- “ ‘Puffing’ has been described by most courts as involving outrageous generalized statements, not making specific claims, that are so exaggerated as to preclude reliance by consumers.”
- 35,000 candle power and 10 homUife lamp
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.