Skip to main content
· 8/10/1990

Cook, Perkiss And Liehe, Inc. v. Northern California Collection Service Inc.

Citations

  • 911 F.2d 242
  • 15 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1894
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 13667

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that statement “we’re the low cost commercial collection experts” was puffery because any implication that services were superior to that of the competition was “merely general in nature”
  • noting that “misdescriptions of specific or absolute characteristics of a product 27 are actionable”
  • upholding the dismissal of a claim without leave to amend where the defect in the pleading could not be cured
  • “ ‘Puffing’ has been described by most courts as involving outrageous generalized statements, not making specific claims, that are so exaggerated as to preclude reliance by consumers.”
  • 35,000 candle power and 10 homUife lamp

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.