Cony v. Wheelock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the “dangerous quality and prejudicial consequences” from this type of evidence
• no hearsay exceptions for statements made to a friend or teacher
• \A party claiming palpable error must show a probability of a different result or .error so fundamental as to threaten a defendant's entitlement to due process oflaw. It should be so egregious that it jumps off the page ... and cries out for relief\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).