Conwood Company, L.P. v. United States Tobacco Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that a Section 2 attempted monopolization claim requires proof of the defendant’s (1) “possession of monopoly power in a relevant market” and (2) “specific intent to ‘destroy competition or build a monopoly’”
• “”[A]rguments . . . not raised below . . . may not be asserted . . . on appeal.”
• assessment of relevance and reliability “involves a preliminary inquiry as to whether the reasoning or methodology underlying the testimony is scientifically valid and whether that reasoning or methodology properly can be applied to the facts in issue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).