Conwell v. City of Albuquerque

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in reviewing an adjudicative proceeding, the reviewing court generally may not substitute its judgment for that of the administrative decision maker
• stating that judicial review of administrative decision is limited to determining “whether administrative body acted fraudulently, arbitrarily or capriciously, whether the order was supported by substantial evidence”
• while a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of an administrative decision-maker, it may correct the decision-maker’s misapplication of the law
• while a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of an administrative decision-maker, it may correct the decision-maker's misapplication of the law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).