Conway v. Romarion

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A merger clause] does not prevent a claim of fraud arising from representations in the contract itself.”
• “[A merger clause] does not prevent a claim of fraud arising from representations in the contract itself.”
• “[A merger clause] does not prevent a claim of fraud arising from representations in the contract itself.”
• “A merger clause such as the one in the present case prevents a party from claiming reliance upon a representation not contained in the contract.”
• where purchaser did not express a clear intent to affirm the purchase and sale agreement and there was no separate claim for rescission, allegations of fraud in complaint could support a rescission claim
• trial court erred in concluding that plaintiff-buyer failed to exercise due diligence as a matter of law to discover odor and other damaged caused by the seller's cats when the seller took overt steps to conceal the damage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).