Skip to main content
· 7/18/1994

Conway v. Farmers Home Mutual Insurance

Citations

  • 26 Cal. App. 4th 1185
  • 31 Cal. Rptr. 2d 883
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 10065
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5517
  • 1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 741

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering full value of property and lacking any mention of “use interest” deduction in evaluating insured’s recovery for tenant-occupied building
  • “[T]he term replace . . . includes the notion of substituting for an original item another item which serves the same function as the original . . . .”
  • term “replace” includes substituting an item that serves same function
  • term “replace” includes substituting an item that serves same function

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.