Skip to main content
· 11/24/2014

Conway v. County of Tuolumne

Citations

  • 231 Cal. App. 4th 1005
  • 180 Cal. Rptr. 3d 598
  • 2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 1076

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying § 820.2 immunity “to the 26 selection of the means used to effectuate an arrest,” namely the considered decision to use tear 27 gas
  • considering discretionary act immunity on a 7 motion for summary judgment
  • “[D]iscretionary immunity does not apply to . . . using unreasonable force when making an arrest or overcoming resistance to it.” (citations omitted)
  • “[D]iscretionary immunity does not apply to . . . using unreasonable force when making an arrest or overcoming resistance to it.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oliver

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.