Skip to main content
· 5/18/1989

Conway v. Continental Insurance

Citations

  • 447 N.W.2d 761
  • 180 Mich. App. 447

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in an action for no-fault benefits, the no-fault carrier has the burden of proving its entitlement to a setoff
  • “Since the purpose of no-fault insurance is to pay insureds promptly for economic losses, it would defeat the purpose of no-fault insurance if we were to allow an insurance company to delay payments in its hope that it was entitled to reimbursement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gribbs, Holbrook, Reilly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.