Conway v. Boston Edison Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• motion for summary judgment on grounds that claim under MCRA for handicap discrimination was duplicative of claim under M.G.L.c. 151B allowed
• “Because ch. 151B supplies a fully adequate procedure to redress handicap discrimination by an employer, it precludes a right of action arising directly under the constitution”
• “Employers cannot be required to accommodate needs they do not know exist”
• negative employment decision itself does not constitute coercion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).