Conway Bros. v. New York Cent. R.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “chemically engraved” was not a process term because, “read in context, [it] describe[d] the product more by its structure than by the process used to obtain it”
• concluding that “chemically engraved” was not a process term
• reviewing the Commission's summary determinations in accordance with the standards for summary judgment
• “We find no legal error in the administrative law judge's determination that the arguments that Hazani raised for the first time on reconsideration were untimely and could properly be rejected on that ground alone.”
• referring to the dictionary definitions of “integral” and “in”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).