Convent Corporation v. City of North Little Rock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a claim brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 “arises under federal law and will support federal-question jurisdiction pursuant to § 1331”
• noting that a claim brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 “arises under federal law and will support federal-question jurisdiction pursuant to § 1331”
• explaining that a district court “must consider the objective merits of removal at the time of removal, irrespective of the ultimate remand”
• explaining that a district court “must consider the objective merits of removal at the time of removal, irrespective of the ultimate remand” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• noting that Baas and Johnson were decided before Martin
• a claim “under § 1983 arises under federal law and will support federal-question jurisdiction’ pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).