Contrack Watts, Inc., f/k/a Contrack International, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “Nev. Rev. Stat. § 116.3116 et seq. is not facially unconstitutional on the basis of an impermissible opt-in notice scheme.”
• recognizing that Bourne Valley “no longer controls the analysis” in light of SFR 20 Investments Pool1, LLC v. Bank of New York Mellon, 422 P.3d 1248 (Nev. 2018)
• recognizing that Bourne Valley “no longer controls the analysis” in light of SFR 20 Investments Pool1, LLC v. Bank of New York Mellon, 422 P.3d 1248 (Nev. 2018)
• recognizing that Bourne Valley “no longer controls the analysis” in light of SFR 20 Investments Pool1, LLC v. Bank of New York Mellon, 422 P.3d 1248 (Nev. 2018)
• recognizing that Bourne Valley “no longer controls the analysis” in light of SFR 2 Investments Pool1, LLC v. Bank of New York Mellon, 422 P.3d 1248 (Nev. 2018)
• recognizing that Bourne Valley “no longer controls the analysis” in light of SFR 20 Investments Pool1, LLC v. Bank of New York Mellon, 422 P.3d 1248 (Nev. 2018)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).