Continental Southern Lines, Inc. v. Hilland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that there was no finding that defendant “was actually notified and had a fair opportunity to defend itself before the period of limitations had run”
• indicating that there was no finding that defendant “was actually notified and had a fair opportunity to defend itself before the period of limitations had run”
• noting there was no finding that defendant “was actually notified and had a fair opportunity to defend itself before the period of limitations had run”
• noting plaintiff sued “Continental Trailways , Inc.,” when true defendant “Continental Southern Lines, Inc.” used trade name “Continental Trailways ”
• indicating there was no finding defendant “was actually notified and had a fair opportunity to defend itself before the period of limitations had run”
• suing corporation under assumed name did not preclude plaintiff from opportunity to prove corporation was not misled as to mistake

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).