Continental Realty Corp. v. JC Penney Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claim alleging fraud in a real estate deal transaction involving one victim, one group of perpetrators, and a single goal occurring over more than a year is not sufficient for closed-ended continuity
• “[T]here is no reason to believe that Home Depot will continue to provide dummy bids for the Defendants in other real estate transactions.”
• “[Tjhere is no reason to believe that Home Depot will continue to provide dummy bids for the Defendants in other real estate transactions.”
• “[TJhere is no reason to believe that Home Depot will continue to provide dummy bids for the Defendants in other real estate transactions.”
• “[T]o infer a threat of repeated fraud from a single alleged scheme would in effect render the pattern requirement meaningless.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).