Continental Motors Corporation and Continental Aviation and Engineering Corporation v. Continental Aviation Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing decision in which district court “gave too much Nemir further argues that the district court misinterpreted uncritical and literal significance to [an earlier decision]”
• “Protection is warranted on what it has come to signify regardless of any original weakness, actual or supposed.”
• “The remedies of the owner of a registered trademark are not limited to the goods specified in the certificate, but extend to any goods on which the use of an infringing mark is ‘likely to cause confusion.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).