Continental Med., P.C. v. MVAIC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that statement in a “stray footnote” in the IJ’s decision “leaves us with nothing of substance to review”
• noting that a petitioner who has established a 51% chance of persecution is more in need of asylum than one who has simply established a well- founded fear
• “The BIA has established—and federal courts have enforced—extensive limitations on an IJ’s exercise of discretion.”
• “Discretionary denials of asylum are exceedingly rare, and are even more rare when the IJ or BIA has found the applicant entitled to withholding of removal.”
• “[W]e may affirm an agency’s decision only on ‘the grounds invoked by the agency’ and the concomitant rule that those grounds ‘must be set forth with such clarity as to be understandable.’” (quoting SEC v. Chenery Corp., 332 U.S. 194, 196 (1947)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).