Continental Insurance v. Ford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the proviso does not cover TSA screeners
• holding that the proviso does not cover TSA screeners
• holding that the proviso does not cover TSA screeners
• \Each of these functions are commonly understood to be traditional law enforcement functions.\
• “Each of these functions are commonly understood to be traditional law enforcement functions.”
• TSA screeners not investigative or law enforcement personnel under § 2680(h)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).