Continental Insurance v. Bahnan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The district court, which saw and heard the witnesses, concluded that Continental had not sailed too close to the chapter 176D winds....”
• property owner who rented the property and lived elsewhere was engaged in \trade or commerce\ and therefore could not bring claim under section 9
• “A violation of chapter 176D may form the predicate for a cause of action under section 9 of chapter 93A, but not under section 11.”
• “[S]ection 11 affords no relief to consumers and, conversely, section 9 affords no relief to persons engaged in trade or commerce.”
• since business plaintiffs only access to 93A is limited to § 11, he cannot maintain derivative 176D claim
• “[S]ection 9 affords no relief to persons engaged in trade or commerce.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).