Skip to main content
· 12/24/2003

Continental Insurance Company v. M/v Orsula, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., Fednav International Ltd., and Atlant Adria Corporation

Citations

  • 354 F.3d 603
  • 2004 A.M.C. 172
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 26288
  • 2003 WL 23010240

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that \[w]e may affirm a district court's judgment on alternate grounds found in the record\
  • noting that the effect of transfer is to preserve the initial filing date for purpose of the statute of limitations
  • enforcing Fednav’s forum-selection clauses and noting that Continental did not contest the validity of the clauses
  • enforcing Fednav’s forum-selection clauses and noting that Conti- nental did not contest the validity of the clauses
  • “While dismissing the suit because of a mistake that is “easy to commit’” might be ‘““so disproportionate’” .. . the ““proper penalty for obvious mistakes that impose costs on opposing parties and on the judicial system is a heavy one.’””
  • finding the district court’s dismissal, rather than transfer, was proper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kanne, Rovner, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.