Continental Casualty Co. v. Coregis Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Court invalidated “other insurance” clauses as mutually repugnant because, though Continental’s “other insurance” clause provided for pro-ration, it actually was an excess clause and, therefore, it was in conflict with Core-gis’s excess clause
• Court invalidated “other insurance” clauses as mutually repugnant because, though Continental’s “other insurance” clause provided for proration, it actually was an excess clause and, therefore, it was in conflict with Coregis’s excess clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).