Continental Casualty Co. v. Benton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the right to wear long hair is clearly protected against government interference but that as against an employer, even a government employer, a grooming regulation will be sustained unless it is so arbitrary that it is a deprivation of a person’s liberty interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).