Continental Can Co. v. Poultry Processing, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that under Maine’s identical U.C.C. provision, a “[d]efendant’s admission serves only to remove the bar of the statute of frauds; it does not establish the terms of the contract”
• finding that “once the contract itself is admitted, parol evidence may be used to prove the terms of the contract”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).