· 7/29/1974
Continental Can Co. v. Hudson Foam Latex Prod., Inc.
Citations
- 324 A.2d 60
- 129 N.J. Super. 426
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the application of collateral estoppel depends on many factors, all of which must be considered “because they contribute to the greatest good for the greatest number so long as fairness is not sacrificed on that altar”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Kolovsky, Fritz and Crane
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.