Skip to main content
· 7/29/1974

Continental Can Co. v. Hudson Foam Latex Prod., Inc.

Citations

  • 324 A.2d 60
  • 129 N.J. Super. 426

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the application of collateral estoppel depends on many factors, all of which must be considered “because they contribute to the greatest good for the greatest number so long as fairness is not sacrificed on that altar”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Kolovsky, Fritz and Crane

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.