Continental Airlines, Inc. v. United Airlines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a full Rule of Reason analysis requires the examination of alternatives
• stating the full rule of reason should be used “for restraints whose net impact on competition is particularly difficult to determine”
• remanding for reconsideration of an injunction involving airport security screening equipment and recognizing that, “on remand, the district court and the parties will undoubtedly have to deal with [the ramifications of September 11th] in considering any prospective relief’
• “Certainly courts have been wary of summary judgment in the context of quick-look analysis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).