Continental Airlines, Inc. v. United Air Lines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Plaintiffs’ claims, which challenge defendants’ agreement to restrict the size of carry-on baggage ..., clearly relate to ‘services of an air carrier’ that a state law may not regulate under the ADA.”
• “It is well to remember, however, that the per se and [rJule of [rJeason considerable inquiry into market conditions before the evidence justifies a presumption of anticompetitive conduct.” Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Ass’n v. Ba. of Regents, 468 U.S. 85, 104 n.26 (1984

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).