Contested Election of Wheelock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that \[t]o accord greater credibility to one witness' testimony than to that presented by others is simply a manifestation of the Board's fact-finding role and does not constitute a capricious disregard of evidence\
• explaining that “[t]o accord greater credibility to one witness’ testimony than to that presented by others is simply a manifestation of the Board’s fact-finding role and does not constitute a capricious disregard of evidence”
• explaining that \[t]o accord greater credibility to one witness' testimony than to that presented by others is simply a manifestation of the Board's fact-finding role and does not constitute a capricious disregard of evidence\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).