Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that DHS’s interpretation would require relators to submit a combined-cost report
• setting forth the criteria for when we defer to an agency's interpretation of its own rule
• stating that “[w]hen the agency’s construction of its own regulation is at issue . . . , considerable deference is given to the agency interpretation, especially when the relevant language is unclear or susceptible to different interpretations”
• setting forth the criteria for when we defer to an agency’s interpretation of its own rule
• defining \sale\ as, inter alia, \The transfer of property or title for a price.\
• describing DHS as acting “without any explanation or warning” and “failing] to give any indication to the nursing homes” that a restrictive definition would be given to the relevant language

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).