Skip to main content
· 4/12/1988

Contested Case of Surf & Sand Nursing Home v. Department of Human Services

Citations

  • 422 N.W.2d 513
  • 1988 Minn. App. LEXIS 348
  • 1988 WL 30958

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that co-conspirator's statements were admissible because his acts were in furtherance of the conspiracy
  • holding that co-conspirator's statements were admissible because his acts were in furtherance of the conspiracy
  • ALJ’s ruling on discovery motion will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Foley, Norton, Mulally

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.