Skip to main content
· 9/1/1992

Conte v. Justice

Citations

  • 802 F. Supp. 997
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13143
  • 1992 WL 214308

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying New Jersey law after the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey transferred the case to the Court under § 1404(a) sua sponte
  • noting conflicts in the punitive damages laws of Maryland, New Jersey, and Ohio
  • same; also noting spoliation argument raised at summary judgment was untimely

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kram

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.