Contact Lenses Unlimited, Inc. v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that contractual requirements imposed upon the defendant would be meaningless if the defendant could ignore those provisions with no penalty
• holding that contractual requirements imposed upon the defendant would be meaningless if the defendant could ignore those provisions with no penalty
• holding that contractual requirements imposed upon the defendant would be meaningless if the defendant could ignore those provisions with no penalty
• holding that a contract clause imposing liability for gross negligence or willful misconduct gives rise to contract action
• \[c]ourts will give a reasonable construction to contracts rather than one leading to absurd results\
• “[cjourts will give a reasonable construction to contracts rather than one leading to absurd results”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).