Consumer Federation of America and Public Citizen v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the agency’s interpretation of an ambiguous statutory provision inadequate in part because the agency failed to define “normal working conditions” and explain why the protocol it selected was normal
• statutory reading unlikely when Congress “presumably would have drafted the statute differently” to achieve obvious alternative outcome

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).