Skip to main content
· 3/24/2006

Consumer Defense Group v. Rental Housing Industry Members

Citations

  • 40 Cal. Rptr. 3d 832
  • 137 Cal. App. 4th 1185
  • 2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2503
  • 2006 Daily Journal DAR 3584
  • 2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 407

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • commenting that the “purpose of these [Proposition 65] notices is to enable ‘meaningful investigation’ by those public authorities ‘prior to citizen intervention’ ”
  • dismissing UCL claim where 22 predicate claims were dismissed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sills

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.