· 3/24/2006
Consumer Defense Group v. Rental Housing Industry Members
Citations
- 40 Cal. Rptr. 3d 832
- 137 Cal. App. 4th 1185
- 2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2503
- 2006 Daily Journal DAR 3584
- 2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 407
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- commenting that the “purpose of these [Proposition 65] notices is to enable ‘meaningful investigation’ by those public authorities ‘prior to citizen intervention’ ”
- dismissing UCL claim where 22 predicate claims were dismissed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sills
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.