Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc. v. Kintetsu Enterprises of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a sanctions order, 15 the time for which to appeal had expired, was “final and on the merits” as to the issues contained 16 within the order, even though the merits of the underlying case had not reached final judgment
• “[Notice] provides the public prosecutor the means to assess whether to intervene on behalf of the public” and “further affords the accused an opportunity to forestall litigation by settling with the plaintiff or by curing any violation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).