Skip to main content
· 10/31/1984

Consul, Ltd. v. Transco Energy Co.

Citations

  • 596 F. Supp. 432
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22323

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dissent argues that Davis issue was not considered and should have been presented to district court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Erwin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.