Construction Industry Workers' Compensation Group Ex Rel. Mojave Electric v. Chalue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reiterating that statutes must be given their plain meaning and pointing out that this court has consistently upheld the plain meaning of Nevada’s workers’ compensation law
• relying on testimony of employee and foreman and report of medical personnel who initially attended to employee after accident
• relying on testimony of employee and foreman and report of medical personnel who initially attended to employee after accident
• requiring a workers’ compensation claimant to rebut the presumption that a controlled sub stance caused his work-related injuries by a preponderance of the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).