Skip to main content
· 4/21/2009

Construction & Design Co. v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Services

Citations

  • 563 F.3d 593
  • 28 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1814
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 8253
  • 2009 WL 1058069

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that cash flow is the relevant consideration in determining an employer’s ability to pay a proposed wage
  • “If the firm has enough cash flow, either existing or anticipated, to be able to pay the salary of a new employee along with its other expenses, it can ‘afford’ that salary.”
  • “The employer . . . bears the burden of proof.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Flaum, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.