Skip to main content
· 7/9/1991

Construction Contracting & Management, Inc. v. McConnell

Citations

  • 815 P.2d 1161
  • 112 N.M. 371

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that even an intentional breach of contract may not serve as the basis for an award of punitive damages where non-breaching party is fully compensated and inability to perform the contract without substantial financial loss is legitimate business reason
  • reiterating that “[t]he mere fact that the parties are in disagreement on construction to be given to the contract does not necessarily establish an ambiguity” (quoting Levenson v. Mobley, 744 P.2d 174, 176 (N.M. 1987)
  • ‘‘an award of actual damages unrelated to delay does not preclude an award of liquidated damages for delay-related damages’’ as ‘‘[t]he vice to be guarded against is a duplication of damages’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • standard for imposing punitive damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Montgomery, Baca, Franchini

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.