Constitutionality of Statute Governing Appointment of United States Trade Representative

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reiterating that “the purpose of Rule 564 is to ensure that a (Footnote Continued Next Page
• explaining “claims implicating the discretionary aspects of sentencing raised in the context of an ineffectiveness claim are cognizable under the PCRA”
• “Unlike the discretionary aspects of sentencing, a challenge to the legality of sentence is not subject to waiver and may be raised at any time.”
• appellant waived claim where only cited single case and relied on suppositions and bald facts
• defendant showed prejudice sufficient to prove ineffective assistance of counsel where consecutive sentences that counsel had failed to challenge resulted in an excessive sentence
• “claims implicating the discretionary aspects of sentencing raised in the context of an ineffectiveness claim are cognizable under the PCRA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).