Skip to main content
· 7/5/1994

Constant v. Spartanburg Steel Products, Inc.

Citations

  • 447 S.E.2d 194
  • 316 S.C. 86
  • 1994 S.C. LEXIS 162

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is ordinarily for the jury to determine whether the privilege has been abused or exceeded.”
  • cited by plaintiff for the proposition that damages in a per se defamation case are presumed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Harwell, Chandler, Finney, Toal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.