Consolidation Coal Co. v. White

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding an order is only final under Wickett when there is “no conceivable legal theory under which Appellants could prevail”
• holding an order is only final under Wickett when there is “no conceivable legal theory under which Appellants could prevail”
• holding an order is only final under Wickett when there is “no conceivable legal theory under which Appellants could prevail”
• holding an order is only final under Wickett when there is “no conceivable legal theory under which Appellants could prevail”
• stating that because the surface estate and mineral estate are severable, “different owners may hold title to separate and distinct estates in the same land”
• stating that because the surface estate and mineral estate are severable, “different owners may hold title to separate and distinct estates in the same land” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).