Consolidation Coal Co. v. Boston Old Colony Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the circuit court erred by finding that the insurance policy provided only $1,000,000 in coverage, instead of $2,000,000 in coverage”
• “[C]omplaints are to be read liberally in accordance with the notice pleading theory underlying the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).