· 12/22/2010

Consolidation Coal Co. v. Benefits Review Board

Citations

629 F.3d 322
2011 A.M.C. 1013
2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 25979
2010 WL 5176847

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

adopting a liberal reading of “adjoining area” after looking to Winchester and the Ninth Circuit, and specifically rejecting the Sidwell approach

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hardiman, Greenaway, Nygaard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.